tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4570142759665414946.post7034805644957598823..comments2023-07-18T05:43:57.793-07:00Comments on Evan McKenzie on Politics and Law: Geraldine Ferraro lets her emotions do the talking - The Daily BreezeEvan McKenziehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04479661304143631524noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4570142759665414946.post-85311388890587306612008-03-12T14:57:00.000-07:002008-03-12T14:57:00.000-07:00Nevermind... Ms. Ferraro just resigned.http://poli...Nevermind... Ms. Ferraro just resigned.<BR/><BR/>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/12/ferraro-steps-down/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4570142759665414946.post-39352132724916498012008-03-11T21:15:00.000-07:002008-03-11T21:15:00.000-07:00Hillary said that she regretted those words used, ...Hillary said that she regretted those words used, but did not force Geraldine to resign, unlike the foreign adviser to Obama that called Hillary "a monster" when talking about her tactics and behavior while campaigning in Ohio and Texas.<BR/><BR/>You tell me which is a worse insult. Why doesn't Geraldine have to resign? Why isn't Clinton forced to both reject and denounce her words like she did with Obama about Farrakhan, whom has absolutely no connection with his campaign whatsoever?<BR/><BR/>When she says she's using "kitchen sink tactics" doesn't that automatically mean you can assume the worst? I'm just saying is all.<BR/><BR/>:-)<BR/>--- Chris HollanderAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4570142759665414946.post-74011043927681566012008-03-11T19:38:00.000-07:002008-03-11T19:38:00.000-07:00I find it particularly antagonistic (I can't think...I find it particularly antagonistic (I can't think of a better word than that) to imply that this was said at the request of Clinton's campaign. Does Ferarro not have a mind and opinion of her own? Wouldn't the Clinton campaign be able to swing something a little more noteworthy than an interview with the Daily Breeze out of nowhere California?<BR/><BR/>I also think it is a particularly bad choice of words to express the sentiment. Could not the same be said for Clinton (and even Ferarro herself): that the only reason she is where she is is because she's a woman?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com